UnixTime

Research Note

ISO 27001 A.5.23 - Information Security for Use of Cloud Services

Cloud services must be governed from selection to exit. The organization needs defined processes for buying, configuring, using, monitoring, changing, and leaving cloud services...

On this page

Requirement

Requirement lens

Treat this as the control objective. The implementation, evidence, and audit sections explain how to make it operational and provable.

“Processes for acquisition, use, management and exit from cloud services shall be established in accordance with the organization’s information security requirements.”

Plain-language meaning

Cloud services must be governed from selection to exit. The organization needs defined processes for buying, configuring, using, monitoring, changing, and leaving cloud services in line with its security requirements.

Cloud is not just another supplier category. It has supplier risk, but also shared responsibility, fluid data locations, standard provider terms, configurable security features, identity integration, support access, resilience assumptions, and exit risk.

Why this matters

Cloud services can improve resilience and speed, but they also create risk when the organization does not understand what the provider secures and what the customer must secure.

Examples:

  • customer data stored or supported from unexpected jurisdictions;
  • encryption or logging available but not enabled because it costs extra;
  • provider standard terms that do not match the organization’s risk appetite;
  • unclear responsibility for identity, backup, incident notification, or configuration;
  • no exit plan if the provider changes terms, fails, or is replaced;
  • incident notices hidden in a portal instead of proactively communicated.

Implementation guidance

Implementer focus

Turn this section into owners, procedures, records, review cadence, and evidence locations. A control is not implemented until it operates repeatedly.

1. Define a cloud acquisition process

Before adopting a cloud service, assess:

Area Practical question
Business need Why is this cloud service needed?
Information exposure What data will be stored, processed, transmitted, logged, or supported?
Data location Can location be constrained to required regions?
Support location Can support access be constrained or approved?
Shared responsibility What does the provider secure and what must the customer secure?
Security features Are encryption, logging, backup, MFA, key management, and monitoring included or extra?
Integration How will identity, access, logging, and incident response integrate with internal processes?
Exit How will data be exported, deleted, validated, and transitioned?

2. Maintain a cloud service register

The organization should know which cloud services are approved, who owns them, what information they hold, and how they are reviewed.

Minimum useful fields:

  • cloud service name;
  • business owner;
  • supplier/provider;
  • information classification;
  • data location and residency constraint;
  • support location or access model;
  • shared responsibility summary;
  • security features enabled;
  • agreement reference;
  • incident notification method;
  • review frequency;
  • exit strategy status.

3. Define shared responsibility clearly

Cloud control gaps often happen because both parties assume the other side is responsible.

Examples:

Responsibility area Provider may own Customer may own
Physical data center security Facility controls Provider selection and assurance review
Platform availability Cloud infrastructure resilience Architecture, backup, continuity objectives
Identity Platform identity features User lifecycle, MFA, privileged access
Encryption Encryption capability Enabling encryption and key decisions
Logging Logging services Enabling, retaining, reviewing logs
Incident notification Provider notice Internal incident response and escalation

4. Manage data location and jurisdiction

Cloud data location can be difficult because major providers use distributed architecture. The organization should define where data may be stored, processed, backed up, and supported from.

If the provider can only answer “it depends,” the organization still needs a risk decision.

5. Plan exit from the beginning

Exit strategy is part of cloud security. Define:

  • export format;
  • migration dependencies;
  • deletion and destruction evidence;
  • retention and backup handling;
  • identity/access removal;
  • contract termination steps;
  • business continuity during transition;
  • validation that data is no longer accessible.

Audit guidance

Auditor focus

Look for evidence that the process operates in practice, not just that a document exists.

Auditors should verify that cloud service acquisition, use, management, and exit are governed by defined processes and risk decisions.

Audit tests:

  • request the cloud service register;
  • sample cloud services by criticality and information sensitivity;
  • review cloud risk assessments and approval records;
  • compare provider terms with organizational security requirements;
  • check shared responsibility documentation;
  • verify data location, support location, and jurisdiction decisions;
  • check whether required security features are enabled;
  • review service review meetings, dashboards, or provider reports;
  • verify proactive incident notification arrangements;
  • check whether provider incident advice was reviewed and acted on;
  • review exit plans for critical cloud services.

Auditors should expect some cloud provider terms to be standard and non-negotiable. The issue is not whether every term was negotiated; the issue is whether risks above tolerance were understood and accepted by the right management level.

Evidence examples

Evidence quality

Strong evidence links requirement, owner, action, date, review, and outcome. Weak evidence usually proves only intent.

Evidence What it proves
Cloud service register Cloud services are known and owned
Cloud risk assessment Cloud-specific risks are evaluated
Shared responsibility matrix Control ownership is clear
Security requirements checklist Acquisition criteria are defined
Cloud agreement/security addendum Requirements are formally addressed
Configuration evidence Required controls are enabled
Provider assurance reports Provider controls are reviewed
Service dashboards/reports Performance and availability are monitored
Incident notification records Provider incidents are communicated and reviewed
Exit plan Migration, deletion, and termination are planned

Strong evidence

  • Cloud register includes owner, classification, location, support model, provider, and exit status.
  • Risk assessment covers data residency, shared responsibility, provider terms, configuration, and exit.
  • Security features such as encryption, logging, MFA, backup, and monitoring are explicitly enabled or risk-accepted.
  • Provider incident notifications are proactive and internally reviewed.
  • Exit plans exist for critical cloud services.
  • Risks above tolerance are accepted by appropriate management.

Weak evidence

  • Cloud services known only through finance/procurement spend.
  • Provider certification accepted without checking the organization’s shared responsibilities.
  • Data location and support location are unknown.
  • Security features exist but are not enabled.
  • Provider portal has incident notices but nobody checks or receives notifications.
  • No exit plan because the provider is assumed to be permanent.

Common failures

Implementation watchouts

These are the fastest ways this topic fails in real ISMS work.

Failure Why it matters
Treating cloud as ordinary procurement only Cloud-specific shared responsibility and location risks are missed
No cloud service register Shadow cloud and unmanaged services persist
No data residency decision Legal and contractual requirements may be breached
No shared responsibility matrix Control gaps remain hidden
Paying extra controls not budgeted Required security features are not enabled
No incident notification route Organization learns about incidents too late
No exit plan Provider change, failure, or termination becomes operationally risky

Exam traps

Exam focus

Read these as distractor patterns. Exams often test scope, timing, ownership, applicability, and evidence quality.

  • A.5.23 covers acquisition, use, management, and exit, not only cloud procurement.
  • Cloud services are supplier relationships, but cloud has specific risks such as shared responsibility, data location, support location, and exit.
  • Provider standard terms may still be acceptable if risk is understood and accepted at the right level.
  • Provider certification does not prove the customer’s cloud configuration is secure.
  • Exit strategy matters as much as onboarding.

KB-ready summary

Quick refresher

Use this section for last-day review and for explaining the topic to a control owner.

A.5.23 requires defined processes for cloud service acquisition, use, management, and exit. Practical implementation includes a cloud register, cloud risk assessment, shared responsibility matrix, data location decisions, required security configuration, provider monitoring, incident notification, and exit planning.

Templates and checklists

  • Iso27001
  • Iso27002
  • Annex a
  • Organizational controls
  • Cloud security
  • Supplier security
  • Audit

Note Metadata

Aliases: A.5.23, Information Security for Use of Cloud Services

Source: 02 Annex A Organizational Controls/A.5.23 Information Security for Use of Cloud Services.md

Control dependency map

How this control connects to work products

Generated from the static research graph. It shows navigation and evidence dependencies; it is not an audit conclusion.

11

links

01
02
03

Audit checks

Audit questions, checklists, or review material connected to the control.

04

Risk treatment

Risk records and ISO 27005 material this control mitigates or supports.

Graph-sourced resources

Templates and evidence

Implementer templates

Working artifacts for control owners and operators.

Auditor evidence packs

Evidence collections and audit-facing verification material.

Risk treatment artifacts

Risk records, mappings, and treatment-supporting references.