UnixTime

Research Note

AQ-ISO27001-A.6.4 Disciplinary Process

Audit question set for ISO27001-A.6.4. Use it to validate implementation, operating evidence, exceptions, review cadence, ownership, and corrective action.

On this page

Audit Question

  • How does the organization prove ISO27001-A.6.4 is implemented and operating?
  • What evidence shows ownership, review cadence, exceptions, and corrective action?
  • Which failed condition would create an audit finding for this control?

Expected Answer

A strong answer should connect ISO27001-A.6.4 to assigned ownership, documented requirements, operating records, review cadence, exceptions, and corrective action. The answer should explain how this control changes risk, not merely assert that a document exists.

Expected Evidence

Weaknesses / Gaps

  • Evidence proves a document exists but not that the control operated.
  • Ownership, review frequency, exception handling, or corrective action is missing.
  • The control is not linked to risk treatment, affected assets, or audit scope.

Improved Answer

A defensible answer should cite a recent sample, the responsible owner, the evidence record, and the decision made when the control produced an exception or required follow-up.

  • Iso27001
  • Iso27002
  • Audit
  • Audit question
  • Annex a
  • A6 4

Note Metadata

Aliases: AQ-ISO27001-A.6.4, ISO27001-A.6.4 Audit Question

Source: 04-ISMS-Artifacts/AQ-ISO27001-A.6.4-disciplinary-process.md

Graph-sourced resources

Templates and evidence

Implementer templates

Working artifacts for control owners and operators.

Auditor evidence packs

Evidence collections and audit-facing verification material.